On 19 August 2026, US President Donald Trump met with leading figures of the crypto industry at the Eisenhower Building on the White House campus and called on the Senate to approve the crypto market structure bill known as the CLARITY Act. Senior executives from companies such as Coinbase, Ripple, Gemini, Robinhood, Polymarket, and Kalshi, as well as SEC and CFTC leadership, attended the meeting.
The market reaction was sharp. Bitcoin briefly rose above 70.000 dollars for the first time since 2 June, Ethereum surged double digits in a single session, and the total crypto market capitalization crossed above 2.3 trillion dollars.
The purpose of this article is not to repeat the headline, but to clarify two things: the bill has not yet been approved, and Trump's statement is not the sole reason for the rally. We address both in turn.
What happened in the market: 19-20 August figures
The movement spread across the broader crypto market and was stronger in altcoins than in Bitcoin — a pattern frequently seen in regulatory news, because the assets most affected by legal uncertainty are not Bitcoin, but tokens whose classification as securities remains controversial.
- –Bitcoin: Traded in the 68.000-69.700 dollar range, surging above 70.000 dollars at the intraday peak; 24-hour change is between approximately +5% and +7% depending on the source and time.
- –Ethereum: Reclaimed the 2.000 dollar level and rose to around 2.250 dollars; daily gain in the 17-18% range.
- –Solana: approximately 85 dollars, daily +10.8%.
- –XRP: approximately 1.10 dollars, daily +10.3%.
- –Total crypto market capitalization rose above 2.32 trillion dollars; Bitcoin dominance is around 61%.
The figures here belong to the 19-20 August sessions and diverge because different sources provide different snapshots — while some publications report the peak around 71.800 dollars, measurements closer to the close show the 68.000-69.000 dollar range. This is not a contradiction, but different hours of the same day. When trading, your sole reference should be the live price on your own platform.
What exactly does the CLARITY Act do?
Its full name is the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. Today in the US, whether a crypto asset is considered a security (SEC jurisdiction) or a commodity (CFTC jurisdiction) is largely determined case by case, ruling by ruling. This uncertainty leaves blurred both which rules exchanges must follow and whether project teams can operate in the US.
The framework the bill aims to introduce can be summarized under three main headings:
- –Clarifying at the federal level which agency will oversee which digital asset — that is, drawing the boundary of authority between the SEC and CFTC.
- –Establishing rules regarding registration, operations, and the protection of customer assets for crypto exchanges and intermediaries.
- –Setting ethical boundaries regarding public officials issuing digital assets and earning income from them.
The exact reason the industry has wanted this law for years is item one: a clear rule, even if restrictive, is preferred to uncertainty, because uncertainty makes investment and product planning impossible.
The law is not approved — the calendar and actual status
This distinction needs to be underlined because the news often circulates on social media giving the impression that the bill was passed. Trump's statement on 19 August was not an approval, but a call. The bill is still pending in the Senate.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune filed a cloture motion for the bill on 8 August; this step paved the way for a procedural vote to be held on 15 September. However, what will be voted on there is not the passage of the bill, but whether to begin debate.
The numerical breakdown is as follows: 60 votes are required in the Senate for the bill to move forward, and Republicans need approximately six Democratic votes. The bill passed the Senate Banking Committee in May with the support of only two Democrats, and that gap has not been closed since then.
There are three main reasons for the bottleneck:
- –Ethics provisions: A regulation proposing to prohibit public officials and their spouses from issuing digital assets. The compromise text prepared by Senators Ruben Gallego and Thom Tillis also requires Trump to divest from his stakes in crypto companies; Trump has not yet approved this text. According to the disclosure released in June, the president's income from crypto ventures in 2025 was close to $1.2 billion.
- –Lack of agreement on combating illicit finance and the scope of law enforcement powers.
- –The debate over whether stablecoins can distribute yield or rewards to users — a topic heavily lobbied by the banking sector.
Three catalysts behind the rally
The headline was Trump's call, but three separate developments overlapped within the same 48 hours. To honestly explain the scale of the move, all three must be counted:
- –Policy signal: Trump's call for the CLARITY Act and, a day earlier on August 18, the SEC proposing a draft rule directly targeting token issuances for the first time.
- –Macro: The US Treasury increased its long-term bond buybacks from $2 billion to $4 billion per transaction. The 30-year bond yield declined from 5.337% to 5.18%, and this easing in yields directly increased demand for risk assets.
- –Mechanics: short position liquidation. Within 24 hours, approximately $1.7-1.9 billion worth of positions were liquidated, the vast majority of which were short positions.
The third point is particularly important. A short squeeze is not a demand story; it is a forced buying story: rising prices force investors who bet downward to buy in order to close their positions, these buys push the price even higher, and the cycle feeds itself. Such moves come quickly; when the catalyst is exhausted and forced buys end, gains can be reversed just as fast.
So the rally on August 19 was not merely the pricing in of a regulatory expectation, but a move stacked with leverage liquidations. This distinction determines how assertive you can be regarding the move's sustainability.
Three scenarios for September 15
What the market is currently pricing in is not an outcome, but a probability. There are three plausible outcomes of the vote, and a different price behavior is expected for each:
- –Procedural vote passes: The bill enters the Senate agenda. This does not mean the law is passed, but it reduces uncertainty. The expected reaction is positive; however, since the news is partially priced in, profit-taking following the initial reaction is common.
- –Procedural vote fails: The 60-vote threshold cannot be passed, and the process returns to uncertainty. Reversing part of the August rally is the most likely scenario; in this case, the severity of the drop will be determined this time by the liquidation of leveraged long positions.
- –A compromise is reached by softening provisions: Progress is made by flexing the ethics clauses or the stablecoin topic. This is generally the most positive scenario for the market, as both the timeline moves forward and the jurisdictional clarity desired by the sector is maintained.
A classic pattern needs to be noted here: buy the rumor, sell the news. In regulatory processes, prices often rise during the expectation phase and pull back when the news materializes, even if the outcome is positive. This is not a rule, but a frequently repeated behavioral pattern.
If you are going to trade on this news
The most common mistake in news-driven moves is predicting the direction correctly while sizing the position incorrectly. There are numerous trades that incur losses because intermediate volatility sweeps the stop level despite getting the direction right.
- –Reduce position size compared to a normal session; when volatility increases, the same lot no longer means the same risk. The position size calculator on our website allows you to make this adjustment according to your account.
- –Lower your leverage. The reason for the liquidations exceeding $1.7 billion on August 19 was not a directional error, but the leverage level.
- –Assume spreads will widen during announcement hours and plan your entries to tolerate this widening.
- –Mark September 15 on your calendar. Our economic calendar page allows you to anticipate such planned events in advance; catching non-surprise volatility unprepared is unnecessary.
- –Do not trade based on a single headline. As shown in the three catalyst examples above, the cause of a move is often more than meets the eye.
Conclusion
What happened on August 19 is clear: Trump met with the crypto sector at the White House and called on the Senate to pass the CLARITY Act; the market priced this in with a strong rally alongside bond buybacks and a massive short squeeze. What did not happen is equally clear: the law was not passed, the vote on September 15 is merely a procedural step, and the three key disputes facing the bill remain unresolved.
Not confusing these two sentences is the most valuable position that can be taken in this news. As FXPARTNER, we will continue to follow the process and share developments ahead of the 15 September vote.
This content is for general informational purposes only and is not investment advice. Crypto assets and leveraged transactions involve high risk; you may lose all of your capital.
Sources
The sequence of events, legislative calendar, and price figures in this article were compiled from news dated 19-20 August 2026. Primary sources: public statements of CoinDesk, Forbes, The Block, Decrypt, American Banker, and the US Senate Banking Committee. Figures reflect values at the time of compilation and may have changed by the time you read them.
Best 5 brokers
01XM Global
9.5IndexXM Global
- Min. deposit
- $5
- Leverage
- 1:1000*
02Lite Finance
9.2IndexLite Finance
- Min. deposit
- $10
- Leverage
- 1:1000*
03FxPro
9.1IndexFxPro
- Min. deposit
- $100
- Leverage
- 1:2000*
04MultiBank Group
9.0IndexMultiBank Group
- Min. deposit
- $50
- Leverage
- 1:1000
05AvaTrade
8.9IndexAvaTrade
- Min. deposit
- $100
- Leverage
- 1:400*
Sponsored links. Ranking is based on the FXPARTNER Index score, which consists of regulation, cost, platform, and withdrawal axes; affiliate revenue does not affect the ranking.